Agenda and minutes

Agenda Item No.

Page No.

Application

Speaker

8

22-54

21/02265/FULLS

Mr Coggon (Awbridge Parish Council)

Mr Fry (Objector)

Mr O’Brian and Ms Page (Applicant)

9

55-72

22/00121/FULLS

Mr Davis (Michelmersh and Timsbury)

Mr Boswell (Applicant’s Agent)

APPLICATION NO.

21/02265/FULLS

APPLICATION TYPE

FULL APPLICATION - SOUTH

REGISTERED

30.07.2021

APPLICANT

Mr and Miss O'Brien and Page

SITE

Burbank, Danes Road, Awbridge, SO51 0HL,  AWBRIDGE

PROPOSAL

Demolition of existing garage and construction of new dwelling

AMENDMENTS

Received on 03.12.2021:

• Updated nitrate neutrality assessment

Received on 01.10.2021:

• Amended Plans and Elevations

CASE OFFICER

Mr Graham Melton

Delegated to the Head of Planning and Building for the following:

·  the completion of a legal agreement to secure the installation and ongoing maintenance of the package treatment plant, to ensure the development achieves nutrient neutrality

then PERMISSION subject to:

1.

The development hereby permitted shall be begun within three years from the date of this permission.

Reason:  To comply with the provision of Section 91 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 as amended by Section 51 of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.

2.

The development hereby permitted shall not be carried out except in complete accordance with the details shown on the submitted plans:

Site Location Plan (8106/P01 Rev A)

Proposed Site and Block Plan (8106 P03 Rev C)

Proposed Ground Floor Plan (8106 P04 Rev B)

Proposed First Floor Plan (8106 P05 Rev C)

Proposed Roof Plan (8106 P06 Rev D)

Proposed Sections (8106 P10 Rev D)

Proposed Front and Rear Elevations (8106 P07 Rev B)

Proposed Side Elevations (8106 P08 Rev E)

Tree Protection Plan (TM: 836-02)

Reason:  For the avoidance of doubt and in the interests of proper planning.

3.

The development hereby permitted shall be undertaken in full accordance with the provisions set out within the TP Marsh Consultancy Arboricultural Impact Appraisal and Method Statement dated June 2021 and its associated tree protection plan (reference TM-863-02).

Reason:  To ensure the enhancement of the development by the retention of existing trees and natural features during the construction phase in accordance with Policy E2 of the Test Valley Borough Revised Local Plan (2016).

4.

Tree protective measures installed (in accordance with the tree protection condition) shall be maintained and retained for the full duration of works or until such time as agreed in writing with the Local Planning Authority. No activities, nor material storage, nor placement of site huts or other equipment what-so-ever shall take place within the barrier.

Reason:  To ensure the avoidance of damage to existing trees and natural features during the construction phase in accordance with Policy E2 of the Test Valley Borough Revised Local Plan (2016).

5.

The development hereby permitted shall be designed and built to meet Regulation 36 2 (b) requirement of 110 litres/person/day water efficiency set out in part G2 of Building Regulations 2015.

Reason:  In the interests of improving water usage efficiency in accordance with Policy E7 of the Test Valley Borough Revised Local Plan (2016).

6.

The development hereby permitted shall proceed in accordance with the measures set out in Section 4.0 ‘Discussion’ of the Halfcote, Danes Road, Awbridge, Ecological Impact Assessment (4 Woods Ecology, July 2021), unless varied by a European Protected Species  ...  view the full minutes text for item 508.

APPLICATION NO.

22/00121/FULLS

APPLICATION TYPE

FULL APPLICATION - SOUTH

REGISTERED

17.01.2022

APPLICANT

Mr and Mrs Savage

SITE

Warblers Cottage, Chapel Lane, Timsbury, SO51 0NW, MICHELMERSH AND TIMSBURY

PROPOSAL

Alterations and single storey extension

AMENDMENTS

None

CASE OFFICER

Kate Levey

DELEGATE to the Head of Planning and Building for the following:

·  The imposition of appropriate conditions and notes

then  PERMISSION for the reason:

The proposed extension is modern and distinctly different in the terms of its design and proposed materials when viewed against the principal listed building and would be read as such. Such a contrast would clearly show the evolution of the building through time. As set out in paragraph 8.14 of the officer’s report- the proposal will not result in the loss of any historic fabric and the link to the listed building has a neutral impact on it and its setting. In this instance the extension is set back from the rear elevation of the property but follows the linear characteristics of the existing dwelling and frames, both when viewed from the front and rear of the site, the original 17th Century part of the dwelling. On balance the proposal is considered to have a neutral impact on the setting form and character of the heritage asset.

Taking into consideration the matters outlined above and having carefully considered the content of the recently dismissed planning appeal, it is considered that the proposal would not result in any harm to and would preserve the character, appearance and setting of the asset. The proposal is considered to comply with policy E9 of the RLP, Section 66(1) of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 & Paragraphs 197 & 199 of the NPPF.