Items
| No. |
Item |
207. |
Apologies
Minutes:
Apologies were
received from Councillors Bailey, Burnage, Dunleavey, Ford and
Johnston.
|
208. |
Public Participation
Minutes:
In accordance with the
Council’s scheme of Public Participation, the following spoke
on the application indicated.
|
Agenda Item No.
|
Page No.
|
Application
|
Speaker
|
|
7
|
25-48
|
23/00805/FULLS
|
Ms Eagle and Ms Houghton
(Applicant)
|
|
8
|
49-63
|
23/01560/FULLS
|
Tony Burley (Supporter)
Mr Woodley (Applicant)
|
|
209. |
Declarations of Interest
Minutes:
Councillors Bundy,
Cooper and Parker declared a personal interest in application
23/01560/FULLS in that they knew the applicant. They remained in the room and spoke and voted
thereon.
|
210. |
Urgent Items
Minutes:
There were no urgent items to consider.
|
211. |
Minutes of previous meeting  PDF 206 KB
To approve as a correct record
the minutes of the meeting held on 5 September 2023.
Minutes:
Councillor Cooper
proposed and Councillor A Dowden seconded the motion that the
minutes of the previous meeting held on 5 September 2023 were an
accurate record. Upon being put to the
vote the motion.
Resolved:
That
the minutes of the meeting held on 5 September 2023 be confirmed
and signed as a correct record.
|
212. |
Schedule of Development Applications
Minutes:
Resolved:
That
the applications for development, as set out below, be determined
as indicated.
|
213. |
23/00805/FULLS - 30.03.2023 PDF 619 KB
(OFFICER RECOMMENDATION: PERMISSION)
SITE: The
Romsey School, Greatbridge Road,
Romsey, SO51 8ZB, ROMSEY TOWN
CASE OFFICER: Kate
Levey
Additional documents:
Minutes:
|
|
APPLICATION NO.
|
23/00805/FULLS
|
|
|
APPLICATION TYPE
|
FULL APPLICATION - SOUTH
|
|
|
REGISTERED
|
30.03.2023
|
|
|
APPLICANT
|
The Romsey School
|
|
|
SITE
|
The Romsey School,
Greatbridge Road, Romsey, SO51 8ZB,
ROMSEY TOWN
|
|
|
PROPOSAL
|
Removal of hedgerow, trees and 10 car parking bays
to facilitate bus bay, and installation of 15 car parking bays
along northern boundary and planting
|
|
|
AMENDMENTS
|
As per those detailed on the SAPC
15th August 2023 report to members
|
|
|
CASE OFFICER
|
Kate Levey
|
|
PERMISSION subject
to:
|
|
1.
|
The development
hereby permitted shall not be carried out except in complete
accordance with the details shown on the submitted plans,
numbers
28153-PD200 A,
28153-PD201 A, 28153-PD202 C, 28153-PD199, 28153-PD206,
28153-PD203A, 28153-PD204A
Reason: For the avoidance of doubt and
in the interests of proper planning.
|
|
2.
|
The bus bay and
parking spaces along the northern boundary hereby permitted shall
not be occupied until space has been laid out and provided as
appropriate for the intended use, in accordance with the approved
plan (28153 – PD202C) and this space shall thereafter be
reserved for such purposes at all
times.
Reason: In the interests of highway
safety in accordance with Test Valley Borough Revised Local Plan
(2016) Policy T1.
|
|
3.
|
Notwithstanding
details already submitted on the submitted mitigation planting
plan, a planting plan, detailing tree and hedgerow species, sizes
and numbers, locations and densities of planting shall be submitted
to and agreed by the Local Planning Authority. Hedgerow planting
shall be native, and details to be submitted to the Local Planning
Authority shall include percentage mix of hedgerow species. The new
trees and hedgerows, as detailed, shall be planted in the approved
positions in the first planting season following the completion of
the development. These must be planted in accordance with the
recommendations in BS8545 (2014) Trees: from nursery to
independence in the landscape - Recommendations. If any of the
proposed trees or hedgerow die following planting, they shall be
replaced with similar species in similar positions within six
months of the death of each specimen.
Reason: To ensure the continuation of
canopy cover in the area and enhance the development.
|
|
4.
|
Prior to first
use of the parking spaces along the northern boundary hereby
permitted, a schedule of landscape management and maintenance for a
minimum period of 5 years shall be submitted to and approved in
writing by the Local Planning Authority. The landscape management
plan shall include long term design objectives, management
responsibilities and maintenance schedules for all landscape areas.
The landscaping shall be maintained in accordance with the approved
schedule. Any trees or planting that are removed, die or become, in the opinion of the Local Planning
Authority, seriously damaged or defective within this period, shall
be replaced before the end of the current or first available
planting season following the failure, removal or damage of the
planting.
Reason: To enable the development to respect, complement and
positively integrate into the character of the area in accordance
with Test Valley Borough Revised Local Plan (2016) Policies E1 and
E2.
|
|
5.
|
Development shall
...
view the full minutes text for item 213.
|
|
214. |
23/01560/FULLS - 22.06.2023 PDF 106 KB
(OFFICER RECOMMENDATION: REFUSE)
SITE: Ashley Glebe Farm Barn, Chalk Vale, Ashley, SO20 6RG,
ASHLEY
CASE OFFICER: Paul
Goodman
Additional documents:
Minutes:
|
|
APPLICATION NO.
|
23/01560/FULLS
|
|
|
APPLICATION TYPE
|
FULL APPLICATION -
SOUTH
|
|
|
REGISTERED
|
22.06.2023
|
|
|
APPLICANT
|
Mr and Mrs Ross and Emma Woodley
|
|
|
SITE
|
Ashley Glebe Farm Barn,
Chalk Vale, Ashley, SO20 6RG, ASHLEY
|
|
|
PROPOSAL
|
Reconstruction of barn to create
residential dwelling, conversion of existing outbuilding into home
office and construction of garage.
Details in accordance with plans (21/00650/FULLS) for barn
conversions and garage, following demolition of barn
|
|
|
AMENDMENTS
|
Additional information
14/08/23
|
|
|
CASE
OFFICER
|
Paul Goodman
|
|
Delegate to the Head of Planning and
Building to finalise appropriate wording to conditions associated
with
1. Commencement of development
within 3 years;
2. Controlling external
materials;
3. In accordance with
Arboricultural report;
4. Install Tree Protection
Measures;
5. Provide details of service runs
and avoid trees;
6. Provision of hard and soft
landscaping to the boundaries and public appreciable areas of the
development;
7. Provision and retention of car
parking areas;
8. Controls on the provision of
external lighting;
9. Controls on water efficiency to
110 litres per day per person;
10.
Controls on the hours of construction;
11.
Controls on the contamination and contaminated land;
12. List of approved plans;
13.
Requirement for a Construction and Environmental Management plan
(CEMP);
14. Ensure the Package treatment plant is
installed in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions
and maintained in perpetuity in accordance with the methodology
approved as part of the Habitats Regulation Assessment;
PERMISSION subject to those
conditions.
|
The Committee recognised that the grant of
planning permission in this instance, contrary to the Officer
recommendation, constituted a departure from the adopted
Development Plan (Policy COM02 of the Test Valley Borough Local
Plan 2016) in that the proposal was neither an appropriate form of
development specified in the policy (criterion a), or that it was
essential to be in the countryside (criterion b). Despite that
position, the Committee considered, as material planning
considerations, that the previous approval of a Class Q conversion
of an existing building on site, and a subsequent grant of planning
permission for conversion of the same building, before the building
was demolished weighed in favour of permitting a new-build
residential dwelling on the land in this instance. The Committee
attached significant weight to the position that the new dwelling
was identical in shape, form, appearance and siting of the
previously approved conversion scheme. The Committee also attached
moderate weight to the benefits arising from the clearance, and
“tidying-up”, of demolition material currently at the
site in the interests of protecting the amenity of neighbouring
dwellings. The Committee was also satisfied that suitable
arrangements had been made (secured via condition 14) with regard
to the effect of nitrates arising from the development on the
Solent European site of nature conservation. Whilst this factor
neither weighed-in favour or against the grant of planning
permission the Committee was satisfied that a resolution in favour
of granting planning permission did not require further action from
the Head of Planning and Building in this
respect.
The Committee, having considered the planning
history of the site and environmental benefits associated with
...
view the full minutes text for item 214.
|
215. |
23/01816/FULLN - 20.07.2023 PDF 97 KB
(OFFICER RECOMMENDATION: PERMISSION)
SITE: Kings Farm House, Station Road, Over Wallop, SO20 8HZ,
OVER WALLOP
CASE OFFICER: Gillian
Wheeler
Additional documents:
Minutes:
|
|
APPLICATION NO.
|
23/01816/FULLN
|
|
|
APPLICATION TYPE
|
FULL APPLICATION - NORTH
|
|
|
REGISTERED
|
20.07.2023
|
|
|
APPLICANT
|
Mr and Mrs Steward Macdonald
|
|
|
SITE
|
Kings Farm House,
Station Road, Over Wallop, SO20 8HZ, OVER WALLOP
|
|
|
PROPOSAL
|
Replacement of metal railings at front boundary
with Brick/flint wall
|
|
|
AMENDMENTS
|
Confirmation regarding retention of
brick piers, pillars and plinth received 18.08.23
|
|
|
CASE OFFICER
|
Gillian Wheeler
|
|
PERMISSION subject
to:
|
|
1.
|
The development
hereby permitted shall be begun within three years from the date of
this permission.
Reason: To comply with the provision of Section 91 of the
Town and Country Planning Act 1990 as amended by Section 51 of the
Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.
|
|
2.
|
The development
hereby permitted shall not be carried out except in complete
accordance with the details shown on the submitted plans,
numbers:
Location and Block
Plans, drawing number 900, dated June 2019 and received
14.07.23
Block Plan as
Proposed, drawing number D01, dated June 2023 and received
14.07.23
Front and West
Elevations as Proposed, drawing number D02, dated June 2023 and
received 14.07.23
Reason: For the avoidance of doubt and in the interests of
proper planning.
|
|
3.
|
The development
hereby permitted shall not be erected unless or until samples and
details of the materials to be used, including the lime mortar, and
including a sample flint panel and detailed drawings showing the
design and arrangement of the bricks and flints, have been
submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning
Authority. Development shall be carried out in accordance with the
approved details.
Reason: To
ensure the development has a satisfactory external appearance in
the interest of visual amenities and to ensure that
the details would sustain the significance of the heritage assets
in accordance with Policies E1 and E9 of the Test
Valley Borough Revised Local Plan 2016.
|
|
4.
|
The existing brick
plinth, brick pillars and brick piers shall be retained and
incorporated into the resultant new wall in accordance with the
email received from Stuart MacDonald on 18.08.23 and drawing number
D02.
Reason: To sustain the
significance of the heritage assets in accordance with Policy E9 of
the Test Valley Borough Revised Local Plan 2016.
|
|
Note to
applicant:
|
|
1.
|
In reaching this
decision Test Valley Borough Council (TVBC) has had regard to the
National Planning Policy Framework and takes a positive and
proactive approach to development proposals focused on solutions.
TVBC work with applicants and their agents in a positive and
proactive manner offering a pre-application advice service and
updating applicants/agents of issues that may arise in dealing with
the application and where possible suggesting solutions.
|
The Officer’s recommendation as per the
agenda was proposed by Councillor Cooper and seconded by Councillor
A Dowden. Upon being put to the vote
the motion was carried.
|
216. |
23/01817/LBWN - 20.07.2023 PDF 93 KB
(OFFICER RECOMMENDATION: CONSENT)
SITE: Kings Farm House, Station Road, Over Wallop, SO20 8HZ,
OVER WALLOP
CASE OFFICER: Gillian
Wheeler
Additional documents:
Minutes:
|
|
APPLICATION NO.
|
23/01817/LBWN
|
|
|
APPLICATION TYPE
|
LISTED BUILDING WORKS - NORTH
|
|
|
REGISTERED
|
20.07.2023
|
|
|
APPLICANT
|
Mr and Mrs Steward Macdonald
|
|
|
SITE
|
Kings Farm House,
Station Road, Over Wallop, SO20 8HZ,
OVER
WALLOP
|
|
|
PROPOSAL
|
Replacement of metal railings at front boundary
with Brick/flint wall
|
|
|
AMENDMENTS
|
Confirmation regarding retention of brick
piers, pillars and plinth received 18.08.23
|
|
|
CASE OFFICER
|
Gillian Wheeler
|
|
CONSENT subject
to:
|
|
1.
|
The works hereby
consented to shall be begun within three years from the date of
this permission.
Reason: To comply with the provisions of Section 18 of the
Planning (Listed Building and Conservation Areas) Act 1990, as
amended by Section 51 of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act
2004.
|
|
2.
|
The works hereby
permitted shall not be erected unless or until samples and details
of the materials to be used, including the lime mortar, and
including a sample flint panel and detailed drawings showing the
design and arrangement of the bricks and flints, have been
submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning
Authority. Development shall be carried out in accordance with the
approved details.
Reason: To
ensure the development has a satisfactory external appearance in
the interest of visual amenities and to ensure that
the details would sustain the significance of the heritage assets
in accordance with Policies E1 and E9 of the Test
Valley Borough Revised Local Plan 2016.
|
|
3.
|
The existing brick
plinth, brick pillars and brick piers are to be retained in
accordance with the email received from Stuart MacDonald on
18.08.23 and drawing number D02.
Reason: To sustain the
significance of the heritage assets in accordance with Policy E9 of
the Test Valley Borough Revised Local Plan 2016.
|
|
Note to
applicant:
|
|
1.
|
In reaching this
decision Test Valley Borough Council (TVBC) has had regard to the
National Planning Policy Framework and takes a positive and
proactive approach to development proposals focused on solutions.
TVBC work with applicants and their agents in a positive and
proactive manner offering a pre-application advice service and
updating applicants/agents of issues that may arise in dealing with
the application and where possible suggesting solutions.
|
The Officer’s
recommendation as per the agenda was proposed by Councillor Cooper
and seconded by Councillor A Dowden. Upon being put to the
vote the motion was carried.
|