Venue: Main Hall, Crosfield Hall, Broadwater Road, Romsey, Hampshire, SO51 8GL
Contact: Caroline Lovelock - 01264 368000
Email: clovelock@testvalley.gov.uk
Items
No. |
Item |
270. |
Apologies
Minutes:
Apologies for absence
were received from Councillor Johnston.
|
271. |
Public Participation
Minutes:
In accordance with the
Council’s scheme of Public Participation, the following spoke
on the applications indicated.
Agenda Item No.
|
Page No.
|
Application
|
Speaker
|
7
|
16-90
|
23/02385/FULLS
|
Mr Parkhurst (Applicant)
|
8
|
91-101
|
24/01915/FULLS
|
Mr White (Objector)
|
|
272. |
Declarations of Interest
Minutes:
There were no
declarations of interest.
|
273. |
Urgent Items
Minutes:
There were no urgent
items.
|
274. |
Minutes of previous meeting PDF 96 KB
To approve as a correct record
the minutes of the meeting held on 5 November 2024
Minutes:
Councillor A Dowden
proposed and Councillor Bailey seconded the motion that the minutes
of the previous meeting were an accurate record. Upon being put to the vote, the motion was
carried.
Resolved:
That
the minutes of the meeting held on 5 November 2024 were signed as a
correct record.
|
275. |
Schedule of Development Applications
Minutes:
Resolved:
That
the applications for development as set out below, be determined as
indicated.
|
276. |
24/01915/FULLS - 10.09.2024 PDF 110 KB
(OFFICER RECOMMENDATION: PERMISSION)
SITE: Minden House And Symes
Road, Chambers Avenue, Romsey, ROMSEY TOWN
CASE OFFICER: Simon
Branston-Jones
Additional documents:
Minutes:
|
APPLICATION NO.
|
24/01915/FULLS
|
|
APPLICATION TYPE
|
FULL APPLICATION -
SOUTH
|
|
REGISTERED
|
10.09.2024
|
|
APPLICANT
|
Ms Stephanie Cake
|
|
SITE
|
Minden House And Symes
Road, Chambers Avenue, Romsey, ROMSEY TOWN
|
|
PROPOSAL
|
Install 2 bin store areas,
including concrete hardstanding, pathways, timber fencing and
access gates
|
|
AMENDMENTS
|
None
|
|
CASE
OFFICER
|
Simon Branston-Jones
|
The Officer’s
recommendation, as per the agenda paper, was proposed by Councillor
M Cooper and seconded by Councillor A Dowden. A motion for deferral was proposed by Councillor
Parker and seconded by Councillor A Dowden, upon being put to the
vote the motion was carried.
DEFER
consideration of the application to enable Officers to undertake
the following:
i)
Consultation with the Council’s Waste
Management Team (to include, but not limited to:
o
the impact of the development on refuse
collection,
o
Refuse vehicle and operatives
access
o
convenience of refuse storage for occupants of
the properties.
ii)
Consultation with the Council’s
Environmental Health Team with specific reference to the possible
harmful impact, such as noise and odours, on the amenity of the
dwellings in Hillside Avenue.
iii)
Confirmation on the type of bins to be stored in
the storage areas. Are they communal bins or individual bins for
each property.
iv)
Will the bin storage areas accommodate the
pending change to waste collection in the form of household food
waste recycling bins.
|
|
277. |
24/02126/FULLS - 13.09.2024 PDF 104 KB
(OFFICER RECOMMENDATION: PERMISSION)
SITE: 17 Dibble Drive, North
Baddesley, Southampton, SO52 9NF,
NORTH BADDESLEY
CASE OFFICER: Katie
Savage
Additional documents:
Minutes:
|
APPLICATION NO.
|
24/02126/FULLS
|
|
APPLICATION TYPE
|
FULL APPLICATION -
SOUTH
|
|
REGISTERED
|
13.09.2024
|
|
APPLICANT
|
Mr Rob Stafford
|
|
SITE
|
17 Dibble Drive, North
Baddesley, Southampton, SO52 9NF,
NORTH BADDESLEY
|
|
PROPOSAL
|
Two storey side extension to form
family room and new master bedroom with existing bedroom converted
to walk in wardrobe and replace tile hanging with grey
boarding
|
|
AMENDMENTS
|
|
|
CASE
OFFICER
|
Katie Savage
|
The Officer’s
recommendation, as per the agenda and update paper, was proposed by
Councillor M Cooper and seconded by Councillor A
Dowden. Upon being put to the vote the
motion fell. A motion for refusal was
proposed by Councillor Bundy and seconded by Councillor
Parker. Upon being put to the vote the
motion was carried.
REFUSEDfor the following reasons:
The
proposed development by virtue of its size, scale, mass and
proximity to number 111 Mortimer Way will result in an overbearing
and oppressive impact on 111 Mortimer Way particularly when viewed
from habitable windows to the front elevation of this property. The
proposed side extension with its ‘Juliet balcony’ will
result in overlooking and perceived overlooking of the Living Room
window on the front elevation of 111 Mortimer Way contrary to
policy LHW4 of the Test Valley Borough Revised Local Plan (2016).
Furthermore, the proposed replacement of the hanging tiles with
coloured boarding will result in a harmful change to the character
and appearance of this part of the street scene contrary to policy
E1 of the Test Valley Borough Revised Local Plan (2016). The
benefit of providing additional accommodation for the applicant is
noted, but this minor personal benefit does not outweigh the
identified and real harm to the residential amenities of 111
Mortimer Way. It is also acknowledged that were planning permission
to be granted a condition could be used to control the finished
materials. Taking the above matters into consideration it is
considered that the proposal is contrary to policy E1 & LHW4 of
the Test Valley Borough Revised Local Plan (2016) and the benefits
of the proposal do not outweigh the identified harm.
|
|
|