|
APPLICATION NO.
|
21/02241/FULLN
|
|
|
APPLICATION TYPE
|
FULL APPLICATION -
NORTH
|
|
|
REGISTERED
|
28.07.2021
|
|
|
APPLICANT
|
Mr Chris Rees
|
|
|
SITE
|
Test Valley Farm,
Little Drove Road, Chilbolton, SO20 6AN, CHILBOLTON
|
|
|
PROPOSAL
|
Demolish building and erect seven
residential dwellings with associated access, landscape, and
parking
|
|
|
AMENDMENTS
|
Amended/additional plans and
information received:
•
10.03.2022
•
15.03.2022
|
|
|
CASE
OFFICER
|
Emma Jones
|
|
|
|
|
|
REFUSED for the reasons:
|
1.
|
The amount
of development proposed, together with its layout, appearance and
scale, would be cramped and intensive and would not integrate,
respect or complement the character of the area, and it would have
a detrimental impact on the appearance of the immediate area and
the landscape character of the area. In
addition, the proposed development has not been designed or located
to ensure that the health and future retention of important
landscape features including protected trees would not be
prejudiced, there is limited scope for the provision of new
landscape features to enable the proposed development to positively
integrate into the landscape character of the area, and
arrangements for the long term management and maintenance of the
existing and proposed landscaping have not been
secured. The proposed development would
be contrary to Policies E1 and E2 of the Test Valley Borough
Revised Local Plan 2016 and Policies EN2 and HD4 of the Chilbolton
Neighbourhood Development Plan.
|
2.
|
The
proposed development would result in the loss of habitats at the
site, with no satisfactory justification or suitable mitigation
measures being provided. Furthermore,
insufficient information has been submitted to demonstrate that the
proposals would not impact adversely on roosting or foraging bats
at the site, or on ecological linkages with the nearby West Down
Nature Reserve. The proposed development would not conserve,
restore, or enhance biodiversity, and would not satisfy the three
tests required to be considered in respect of protected species and
the requirements of the Conservation of Habitats and Species
Regulations (as amended). The proposed development would fail to
comply with Policy E5 of the Test Valley Borough Revised Local Plan
(2016) and Policy HD4 of the Chilbolton Neighbourhood Development
Plan.
|
3.
|
Insufficient information has been provided with the application
to demonstrate that the proposal can achieve nutrient
neutrality. As such, it cannot be
concluded that the proposal will not result in a likely harmful
significant effect on the internationally designated nature
conservation sites in the Solent, in accordance with the
requirements of the Conservation of Habitats and Species
Regulations 2017 (as amended) and as advised within guidance from
Natural England (updated March 2022).
As such, the proposal fails to comply with Policies E5 and E8 of
the Test Valley Borough Revised Local Plan (2016) and the
Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2017 (as
amended).
|
4.
|
It
has not been demonstrated that refuse vehicles would be able to
safely and efficiently manoeuvre within the site without conflicts
arising with the proposed buildings and/or landscaping. The proposed internal layout of the development
would therefore not be safe, functional or accessible for all
users, and the proposal would be contrary to Policy T1 of the Test
Valley Borough Revised Local Plan 2016.
|
5.
|
The
car parking provision for proposed plot 1 would not be
appropriately located so as to be convenient to users, and would
encourage parking in locations that could lead to impacts on
highway safety, contrary to Policies T1 and T2 of the Test Valley
Borough Revised Local Plan 2016 and Policy HD5 of the Chilbolton
Neighbourhood Development Plan.
|
6.
|
The proposed
development, by virtue of the potentially limited boundary
treatments separating proposed plot 1 from the adjacent public
right of way, would not provide for the privacy and amenity of the
occupants of this plot, contrary to Policy LHW4 of the Test Valley Borough Revised Local
Plan 2016 and Policy HD4 of the Chilbolton Neighbourhood
Development Plan.
|
7.
|
In
the absence of a legal agreement to secure a financial contribution
towards off site new affordable housing to meet the needs of the
borough, the proposal is contrary to Policy COM7 of the Test Valley
Borough Revised Local Plan 2016.
|
Note
to applicant:
|
1.
|
In
reaching this decision Test Valley Borough Council (TVBC) has had
regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and takes a
positive and proactive approach to development proposals focused on
solutions. TVBC work with applicants and their agents in a positive
and proactive manner offering a pre-application advice service and
updating applicants/agents of issues that may arise in dealing with
the application and where possible suggesting solutions.
|