Venue: Main Hall, Crosfield Hall, Broadwater Road, Romsey, Hampshire, SO51 8GL
Contact: Caroline Lovelock - 01264 368014
Email: clovelock@testvalley.gov.uk
Items
No. |
Item |
502. |
Apologies
Minutes:
Apologies were
received from Councillors Jeffrey and Ward.
|
503. |
Public Participation
Minutes:
In accordance with the
Council’s scheme of Public Participation, the following spoke
on the applications indicated:
Agenda Item No.
|
Page No.
|
Application
|
Speaker
|
8
|
22-54
|
21/02265/FULLS
|
Mr Coggon (Awbridge Parish Council)
Mr Fry (Objector)
Mr O’Brian and Ms Page (Applicant)
|
9
|
55-72
|
22/00121/FULLS
|
Mr Davis (Michelmersh and Timsbury)
Mr Boswell (Applicant’s Agent)
|
|
504. |
Declarations of Interest
Minutes:
Councillor Bailey
wished it to be noted that he knew two of the speakers on
applications 22/00121/FULLS and 22/00122/LBWS but that it did not
constitute an interest.
Councillor A Dowden
wished it to be noted that he knew the applicant on application
22/00121/FULLS but that it did not constitute an
interest.
Councillor C Dowden
wished it to be noted that she knew the applicant on application
22/00121/FULLS but that it did not constitute an
interest.
Councillor Hatley
wished it to be noted that he knew one of the speakers on
application 22/00121/FULLS but that it did not constitute an
interest.
|
505. |
Urgent Items
Minutes:
There were no urgent
items to consider.
|
506. |
Minutes
Minutes:
Resolved:
That
the minutes of the meeting held on 22 February 2022 be confirmed
and signed as a correct record.
|
507. |
Schedule of Development Applications
Minutes:
Resolved:
That
the applications for development, as set out below, be determined
as indicated.
|
508. |
21/02265/FULLS - 30.07.2021 PDF 425 KB
(OFFICER RECOMMENDATION: PERMISSION)
SITE: Burbank, Danes Road,
Awbridge, SO51 0HL, AWBRIDGE
CASE OFFICER: Mr Graham Melton
Additional documents:
Minutes:
|
APPLICATION NO.
|
21/02265/FULLS
|
|
APPLICATION TYPE
|
FULL APPLICATION - SOUTH
|
|
REGISTERED
|
30.07.2021
|
|
APPLICANT
|
Mr and Miss O'Brien and Page
|
|
SITE
|
Burbank, Danes Road,
Awbridge, SO51 0HL, AWBRIDGE
|
|
PROPOSAL
|
Demolition of existing garage and construction of
new dwelling
|
|
AMENDMENTS
|
Received on 03.12.2021:
- Updated nitrate neutrality
assessment
Received on 01.10.2021:
- Amended Plans and Elevations
|
|
CASE OFFICER
|
Mr Graham Melton
|
Delegated to the
Head of Planning and Building for the following:
·
the completion of a legal agreement to secure the installation
and ongoing maintenance of the package treatment plant, to ensure
the development achieves nutrient neutrality
then PERMISSION
subject to:
|
1.
|
The development
hereby permitted shall be begun within three years from the date of
this permission.
Reason: To comply with the provision of Section 91 of the
Town and Country Planning Act 1990 as amended by Section 51 of the
Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.
|
2.
|
The development
hereby permitted shall not be carried out except in complete
accordance with the details shown on the submitted plans:
Site Location Plan
(8106/P01 Rev A)
Proposed Site and
Block Plan (8106 P03 Rev C)
Proposed Ground
Floor Plan (8106 P04 Rev B)
Proposed First Floor
Plan (8106 P05 Rev C)
Proposed Roof Plan
(8106 P06 Rev D)
Proposed Sections
(8106 P10 Rev D)
Proposed Front and
Rear Elevations (8106 P07 Rev B)
Proposed Side
Elevations (8106 P08 Rev E)
Tree Protection Plan
(TM: 836-02)
Reason: For the avoidance of doubt and in the interests of
proper planning.
|
3.
|
The development
hereby permitted shall be undertaken in full accordance with the
provisions set out within the TP Marsh Consultancy Arboricultural Impact Appraisal and Method
Statement dated June 2021 and its associated tree protection plan
(reference TM-863-02).
Reason:
To ensure the enhancement of the development by the
retention of existing trees and natural features during the
construction phase in accordance with Policy E2 of the Test Valley
Borough Revised Local Plan (2016).
|
4.
|
Tree protective
measures installed (in accordance with the tree protection
condition) shall be maintained and retained for the full duration
of works or until such time as agreed in writing with the Local
Planning Authority. No activities, nor material storage, nor
placement of site huts or other equipment what-so-ever shall take
place within the barrier.
Reason: To ensure the avoidance of damage to existing
trees and natural features during the construction phase in
accordance with Policy E2 of the Test Valley Borough Revised Local
Plan (2016).
|
5.
|
The development
hereby permitted shall be designed and built to meet Regulation 36
2 (b) requirement of 110 litres/person/day water efficiency set out
in part G2 of Building Regulations 2015.
Reason: In the interests of improving water usage
efficiency in accordance with Policy E7 of the Test Valley Borough
Revised Local Plan (2016).
|
6.
|
The development
hereby permitted shall proceed in accordance with the measures set
out in Section 4.0 ‘Discussion’ of the Halfcote, Danes Road, Awbridge, Ecological Impact Assessment (4 Woods
Ecology, July 2021), unless varied by a European Protected Species
...
view the full minutes text for item 508.
|
|
509. |
22/00121/FULLS - 17.01.2022 PDF 427 KB
(OFFICER RECOMMENDATION: REFUSE)
SITE: Warblers Cottage, Chapel
Lane, Timsbury, SO51 0NW, MICHELMERSH AND
TIMSBURY
CASE OFFICER: Ms Kate
Levey
Additional documents:
Minutes:
|
APPLICATION NO.
|
22/00121/FULLS
|
|
APPLICATION TYPE
|
FULL APPLICATION - SOUTH
|
|
REGISTERED
|
17.01.2022
|
|
APPLICANT
|
Mr and Mrs Savage
|
|
SITE
|
Warblers Cottage,
Chapel Lane, Timsbury, SO51 0NW, MICHELMERSH AND
TIMSBURY
|
|
PROPOSAL
|
Alterations and single storey extension
|
|
AMENDMENTS
|
None
|
|
CASE OFFICER
|
Kate Levey
|
DELEGATE to the Head of Planning and Building for the
following:
·
The imposition of appropriate
conditions and notes
then PERMISSION for the
reason:
|
The proposed extension is modern and distinctly
different in the terms of its design and proposed materials when
viewed against the principal listed building and would be read as
such. Such a contrast would clearly show the evolution of the
building through time. As set out in paragraph 8.14 of the
officer’s report- the proposal will not result in the loss of
any historic fabric and the link to the listed building has a
neutral impact on it and its setting. In this instance the
extension is set back from the rear elevation of the property but
follows the linear characteristics of the existing dwelling and
frames, both when viewed from the front and rear of the site, the
original 17th Century part of the dwelling. On balance the proposal
is considered to have a neutral impact on the setting form and
character of the heritage asset.
Taking into consideration the matters outlined above
and having carefully considered the content of the recently
dismissed planning appeal, it is considered that the proposal would
not result in any harm to and would preserve the character,
appearance and setting of the asset. The proposal is considered to
comply with policy E9 of the RLP, Section 66(1) of the Planning
(Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 & Paragraphs
197 & 199 of the NPPF.
|
|