Items
| No. |
Item |
328. |
Apologies
Minutes:
Apologies were
received from Councillors Dunleavey and Johnston.
|
329. |
Public Participation
Minutes:
In accordance with the
Council’s scheme of Public Participation, the following spoke
on the applications indicated.
|
Agenda Item No.
|
Page No.
|
Application
|
Speaker
|
|
7
|
21 -
68
|
23/00340/FULLS
|
Sim Dendy
(Applicant)
Robert Dalton
(Objector)
|
|
8
|
69 -
92
|
24/02100/RESS
|
John Critchley
(Romsey Town Council)
Tom Francis
(Applicant)
|
|
9
|
93 -
108
|
23/02044/OUTS
|
Sheila Cook
(Sherfield English Parish Council)
Alex MacGregor
(Objector)
Ian Donohue
(Applicant’s Agent)
Councillor Nick
Adams-King
(Ward Councillor – 5
minutes)
|
|
10
|
109 -
129
|
24/01592/FULLS
|
Brian Nanson
(Ampfield Parish Council)
Barnaby Burnam
(Objector)
Robert Tutton
(Applicant’s Agent)
Councillor Sally
Yalden
(Ward Councillor – 5 minutes)
|
|
11
|
130 -
137
|
24/01933/FULLS
|
Mr Vaughn
(Objector)
Mark Perress (Applicant)
|
|
330. |
Declarations of Interest
Minutes:
Councillor Bailey
wished it to be noted that he knew three of the speakers under
application 23/02044/OUTS but that it did not constitute an
interest.
Councillor Gidley
wished it to be noted that on application 23/00340/FULLS she had
given a Councillor grant to the Freedom Church for the hamper
initiative but that it did not constitute an interest.
|
331. |
Urgent Items
Minutes:
There were no urgent
items.
|
332. |
Minutes of previous meeting  PDF 117 KB
To approve as a correct record
the minutes of the meeting held on 26 November 2024.
Minutes:
Councillor A Dowden
proposed and Councillor Parker seconded the motion that the minutes
of the previous meeting were an accurate record. Upon being put to the vote, the motion was
carried.
|
333. |
Schedule of Development Applications
Minutes:
Resolved:
That
the applications for development as set out below, be determined as
indicated.
|
334. |
23/00340/FULLS PDF 239 KB
(OFFICER RECOMMENDATION: PERMISSION
SITE: Land to the Rear of Esso,
Greatbridge Road, Romsey SO51 0HB
ROMSEY TOWN / ROMSEY EXTRA
CASE OFFICER: Graham
Melton
Additional documents:
Minutes:
|
|
APPLICATION NO.
|
23/00340/FULLS
|
|
|
APPLICATION TYPE
|
FULL APPLICATION - SOUTH
|
|
|
REGISTERED
|
23.02.2023
|
|
|
APPLICANT
|
Mr Sim Dendy
|
|
|
SITE
|
Land to the rear of
Esso, Greatbridge Road, Romsey, SO51
0HB, ROMSEY TOWN ROMSEY EXTRA
|
|
|
PROPOSAL
|
Construction of church and community hub with
associated landscaping and car parking
|
|
|
AMENDMENTS
|
Received on 15.05.24:
·
Planning Statement addendum
·
Additional Photomontage
Received on 25.07.23, 24.08.23 and
21.09.23:
·
Amended Plans and Elevations
·
Additional Road Safety Audit
·
Amended Flood Risk Assessment and Surface Water Drainage Report
·
Amended Arboricultural Statement
·
Amended Preliminary Ecological Appraisal
|
|
|
CASE OFFICER
|
Graham Melton
|
The Officer’s
recommendation, as per the agenda and update paper, was proposed by
Councillor M Cooper and seconded by Councillor A
Dowden. Upon being put to the vote the
motion was carried.
|
PERMISSION subject to:
|
|
1.
|
The
development hereby permitted shall be begun within two years from
the date of this permission.
Reason: The application site is located within land designated
as countryside where development is only permitted in exceptional
circumstances and the proposal is only acceptable as it serves an
immediate community need.
|
|
2.
|
The
development hereby permitted shall not be carried out except in
complete accordance with the details shown on the submitted
plans:
Site
Location Plan (110 A)
Site
Location Plan (annotated)
Proposed Site Plan (300 G)
Proposed Ground Floor Plan (310 B)
Proposed First Floor Plan (311 C)
Proposed Elevations (320 B)
Proposed Elevations (321 C)
Proposed Sections (313 B)
Proposed Prayer Room Plans and Elevations (312 B)
Proposed Bin Store (318 A)
Proposed Visibility Splay (5789 001 Rev A)
Tree
Protection Plan (BJH 03/04)
Reason: For the avoidance of doubt and in the interests of
proper planning.
|
|
3.
|
The
development hereby permitted shall be undertaken in full accordance
with the provisions set out within the Bernie Haverson Arboricultural Impact Appraisal and Method
Statement reference 1257.bjh.Aug23 dated August 2023 and approved
tree protection plan reference BJH 03/04.
Reason:
To ensure the enhancement of
the development by the retention of existing trees and natural
features during the construction phase in accordance with Policy E2
of the Test Valley Borough Revised Local Plan
(2016).
|
|
4.
|
Tree
protective measures installed (in accordance with the tree
protection condition) shall be maintained and retained for the full
duration of works or until such time as agreed in writing with the
Local Planning Authority. No activities, nor material storage, nor
placement of site huts or other equipment what-so-ever shall take
place within the barrier.
Reason: To ensure the avoidance of damage to existing trees and
natural features during the construction phase in accordance with
Policy E2 of the Test Valley Borough Revised Local Plan
(2016).
|
|
5.
|
The
development hereby permitted shall be undertaken in accordance with
the measures set out in section 5 of the Freedom Church Preliminary
Ecological Assessment by Provision dated March 2023 unless varied
by a European Protected Species (EPS) license issued by Natural
England. Thereafter, the replacement features and enhancements
shall be permanently maintained and retained in accordance with the
approved details.
Reason: To ensure the favourable conservation status of
... view
the full minutes text for item 334.
|
|
335. |
24/02100/RESS PDF 127 KB
(OFFICER RECOMMENDATION: APPROVAL)
SITE: Pure 8 Tyre Tech Limited,
Ashfield Sawmill, Southampton Road SO51 9NJ ROMSEY
TOWN
CASE OFFICER: Katie
Nethersole
Additional documents:
Minutes:
|
|
APPLICATION NO.
|
24/02100/RESS
|
|
|
APPLICATION TYPE
|
RESERVED MATTERS -
SOUTH
|
|
|
REGISTERED
|
09.09.2024
|
|
|
APPLICANT
|
Mr Tom Francis
|
|
|
SITE
|
Pure 8 Tyre Tech
Limited, Ashfield Sawmill, Southampton Road, SO51 9NJ, ROMSEY
TOWN
|
|
|
PROPOSAL
|
Application for the approval of
reserved matters (layout, scale and appearance of the buildings and
landscaping) and the discharge of conditions 6 (part) and 13
pursuant to outline planning permission reference 18/01680/OUTS for
the cessation of use of tyre recycling depot (waste transfer
station) with all matters reserved with the exception of access for
the development of 29 no. residential units (Use Class
C3).
|
|
|
AMENDMENTS
|
·
Additional information received 4 October 2024
-
Site Investigation and Generic Quantitative Assessment
-
Discovery Strategy Remediation
·
Additional information received 29th October 2024
-
Ecological Impact Assessment
-
Drainage Method Statement and Risk Assessment
-
Construction Environmental Management Plan
-
Tree Protection Plan
-
Typical Tree Detail
·
Amended plans received 29 October 2024
-
Proposed site plan
-
Proposed floor plans
·
Additional information received 12 November
-
Tree Protection Plan
-
Tree Constraints Plan
-
Arboricultural Statement
-
Landscape Management and Habitat Plan
·
Amended plans received 22 November
|
|
|
CASE
OFFICER
|
Katie Nethersole
|
The Officer’s
recommendation, as per the agenda and update paper, was proposed by
Councillor M Cooper and seconded by Councillor A
Dowden. Upon being put to the vote the
motion was carried.
|
APPROVAL subject to:
|
|
1.
|
Notwithstanding the provisions of the Town and Country Planning
(General Permitted Development) Order 2015 (or any order amending,
revoking or re-enacting that Order), the garage(s) hereby approved
shall at all times be available for the parking of
vehicles.
Reason: In order to maintain the
approved on site parking provision and
to reduce highway congestion in accordance with Test Valley Borough
Revised Local Plan (2016) Policy T2.
|
|
2.
|
No
development shall take place above DPC level of the development
hereby permitted until samples of the materials to be used in the
construction of all external surfaces hereby permitted have been
submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning
Authority. Development shall be carried out in accordance with the
approved details.
Reason: To ensure the development would integrate, respect and
complement the character of the area in accordance with Policy E1
of the Test Valley Borough Revised Local Plan (2016).
|
|
3.
|
The
development hereby permitted shall not be carried out except in
complete accordance with the details shown on the submitted plans,
numbers:
7633_L01
7633_D01_K
7633_D02_E
7633_D03_A
7633_D04_A
7633_D05_A
7633_D06_A
7633_D07_B
7633_D08_A
7633_D09_A
7633_D10_A
7633_D11
7633_D12
7633_D13_A
7633_D14_A
7633_D15_A
7633_D16_B
7633_D17_A
7633_D18_A
7633_D19_B
7633_D20_A
7633_D21_A
7633_D22_A
7633_D23
7633_D24
7633_D25_C
7633_D26_B
NJC-001
NJC-002
ACLA/BVA 01 Rev A
ACLA/BVA 02
RMT1017 Rev A
Reason: For the avoidance of doubt and in the interests of
proper planning.
|
|
4.
|
The
development hereby approved shall be undertaken in full accordance
with the provision set out within the Arboricultural Method Statement (by RMT Tree
Consultancy dated 11th November 2024) and tree
protection plan (RMT1017 Rev A).
Reason: To ensure the enhancement of the development by the
retention of existing trees and ... view
the full minutes text for item 335.
|
|
336. |
23/02044/OUTS PDF 137 KB
(OFFICER RECOMMENDATION: PERMISSION)
SITE: Sandhill Farm, Newtown
Road, Sherfield English SHERFIELD ENGLISH
CASE OFFICER: Mark
Staincliffe
Additional documents:
Minutes:
|
|
APPLICATION NO.
|
23/02044/OUTS
|
|
|
APPLICATION TYPE
|
OUTLINE APPLICATION -
SOUTH
|
|
|
REGISTERED
|
23.08.2023
|
|
|
APPLICANT
|
Mr James Barney
|
|
|
SITE
|
Sandhill Farm, Newtown
Road, Sherfield English, SHERFIELD ENGLISH
|
|
|
PROPOSAL
|
Outline - Erection of dwelling in
lieu of mobile home
|
|
|
AMENDMENTS
|
Amended Planning Statement with
appended appeal decisions – Received 18.07.2024
|
|
|
CASE
OFFICER
|
Mark Staincliffe
|
The Officer’s
recommendation, as per the agenda, was proposed by Councillor M
Cooper and seconded by Councillor A Dowden. Upon being put to the vote the motion was
carried.
|
PERMISSION subject to:
|
|
1.
|
Applications for the approval of all the reserved matters
referred to herein shall be made within a period of three years
from the date of this permission. The development to which the
permission relates shall be begun not later than whichever is the
later of the following dates:
I.
five years from the date of this permission:
or
II.
two years from the final approval of the said
reserved matters, or, in the case of approval on different dates,
the final approval of the last such matter to be
approved.
Reason: To comply with the provision
of S.92 of the Town & Country Planning Act 1990.
|
|
2.
|
Approval of the details of the layout, scale and appearance of
the building, the means of access thereto and the landscaping of
the site (herein after called "the reserved matters") shall be
obtained from the local planning authority in writing before the
development is commenced.
Reason: To comply with the provision
of S.92 of the Town & Country Planning Act 1990.
|
|
3.
|
Any
reserved Matters application shall be accompanied by a plan showing
existing and proposed ground levels as well as plans clearly
identifying both finished floor levels of the proposed
dwelling.
Reason: In the interest of the
amenities of the countryside setting in accordance with Test Valley
Borough Revised Local Plan (2016) Policies COM2, E1 and
E2.
|
|
4.
|
No
dwelling that is subject to a Reserved Matters approval, shall
exceed 4m in height (measured from existing ground level) or have a
footprint (measured externally) larger than 136sqm.
Reason: In the interest of the
amenities of the countryside setting in accordance with Test Valley
Borough Revised Local Plan (2016) Policies COM2, E1 and
E2.
|
|
5.
|
Prior
to commencement of development, a detailed scheme of biodiversity
enhancements, including a detailed planting plan to be incorporated
into the development shall be submitted to and approved in writing
by the Local Planning Authority.
Thereafter, mitigation and enhancement features shall be
permanently maintained and retained in accordance with the approved
details.
Reason: To ensure the favourable conservation status of bats in
accordance with Policy E5 of the Test Valley Borough Revised Local
Plan (2016).
|
|
6.
|
The
development hereby approved shall be designed and built to meet
Regulation 36 2 (b) requirement of 110 litres/person/day water
efficiency set out in part G2 of Building Regulations
2015.
Reason: In the interests of improving water usage efficiency in
accordance with policy E7 of the Test Valley Borough Revised Local
Plan 2016.
|
|
7.
|
Notwithstanding the provisions of the Town ...
view
the full minutes text for item 336.
|
|
337. |
24/01592/FULLS PDF 145 KB
(OFFICER RECOMMENDATION: PERMISSION)
SITE: Land to the rear of The
Paddocks, Winchester Road AMPFIELD
CASE OFFICER: Katie Savage
Additional documents:
Minutes:
|
|
APPLICATION NO.
|
24/01592/FULLS
|
|
|
APPLICATION TYPE
|
FULL APPLICATION - SOUTH
|
|
|
REGISTERED
|
15.07.2024
|
|
|
APPLICANT
|
Horwill Carne Developments
|
|
|
SITE
|
Land to the rear of The
Paddocks, Winchester Road, AMPFIELD
|
|
|
PROPOSAL
|
Erection of two detached dwellings, bin and cycle
store and installation of Package Treatment Plant
|
|
|
AMENDMENTS
|
·
Additional CMP – Received 8th Nov 2024
·
Additional Ecology Report and Ecologist comments – Received
23rd Sep 2024
|
|
|
CASE OFFICER
|
Katie Savage
|
The Officer’s
recommendation, as per the agenda and update paper, was proposed by
Councillor M Cooper and seconded by Councillor A
Dowden. During debate there was a
proposal by Councillor A Dowden to defer the application and was
seconded by Councillor Gidley. Upon
being put to the vote the motion was carried.
DEFERRED to enable the Committee to
undertake a Site Viewing Panel.
|
338. |
24/01933/FULLS PDF 111 KB
(OFFICER RECOMMENDATION: PERMISSION)
SITE: Little Mead Falls, 49
Oxlease Meadows, Romsey SO51 7AB
ROMSEY TOWN
CASE OFFICER: Simon
Branston-Jones
Additional documents:
Minutes:
|
|
APPLICATION NO.
|
24/01933/FULLS
|
|
|
APPLICATION TYPE
|
FULL APPLICATION - SOUTH
|
|
|
REGISTERED
|
21.08.2024
|
|
|
APPLICANT
|
Mr Mark Perress
|
|
|
SITE
|
Little Mead Falls, 49
Oxlease Meadows, Romsey, SO51 7AB, ROMSEY TOWN
|
|
|
PROPOSAL
|
Replacement driveway gates and brick pillars
|
|
|
AMENDMENTS
|
19 November 2024 – Amended Plans
received
|
|
|
CASE OFFICER
|
Simon Branston-Jones
|
The Officer’s
recommendation, as per the agenda, was proposed by Councillor M
Cooper and seconded by Councillor A Dowden. Upon being put to the vote the motion was
carried.
|
PERMISSION subject to:
|
|
1.
|
The
development hereby permitted shall be begun within three years from
the date of this permission.
Reason: To comply with the provision
of Section 91 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 as amended
by Section 51 of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act
2004.
|
|
2.
|
The
development hereby permitted shall not be carried out except in
complete accordance with the details shown on the submitted
plans,
Site
Location Plan
Proposed Plans and Elevations
Specifically, the pillars shall be no taller than 2.4 metres
when measured from existing ground level and the gates at their
highest point shall be no taller than 2.2 metres when measured from
existing ground level.
Reason: For the avoidance of doubt and in the interests of
proper planning.
|
|
3.
|
The
bricks used for the pillars hereby permitted shall match in type,
colour and texture those used on the existing house, and the gates
shall be hardwood to match others within the estate.
Reason: To ensure a satisfactory visual
relationship of the new development with the existing in accordance
with Test Valley Borough Revised Local Plan (2016) Policy
E1.
|
|
4.
|
The
gates hereby permitted shall open inwards only, in
perpetuity.
Reason: In the interests of highway safety in accordance with
Policy T1 of the Test Valley Borough Revised Local Plan
(2016).
|
|
Note
to applicant:
|
|
1.
|
In
reaching this decision Test Valley Borough Council (TVBC) has had
regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and takes a
positive and proactive approach to development proposals focused on
solutions. TVBC work with applicants and their agents in a positive
and proactive manner offering a pre-application advice service and
updating applicants/agents of issues that may arise in dealing with
the application and where possible suggesting solutions.
|
|