|
APPLICATION NO.
|
19/02236/FULLN
|
|
|
APPLICATION TYPE
|
FULL
APPLICATION - NORTH
|
|
|
REGISTERED
|
17.09.2019
|
|
|
APPLICANT
|
Mr J R Brown
|
|
|
SITE
|
23 The
Avenue, Andover, Hampshire, SP10 3EW,
ANDOVER TOWN (MILLWAY)
|
|
|
PROPOSAL
|
Erection of dwelling
and carport and reconstruction of double garage to single garage
with parking and access via Ambleside onto Eversfield Close
|
|
|
AMENDMENTS
|
Please see section 3.4 of Committee report and Update Paper
dated 18.02.2021
|
|
|
CASE
OFFICER
|
Fay Eames
|
|
|
|
|
|
Following a Viewing Panel and careful consideration of the
Officer report and recommendations, Members of the Committee
resolved to REFUSE permission for the following reasons:
|
|
|
1.
|
The
proposed development would due to its cramped plot size, limited
opportunities for landscaping, backland
location, unsympathetic design and overall intensity of development
result in a harmful form of development that would be incompatible
with the character of this part of the Andover Residential Area of
Special Character. As such the proposal
would conflict with policies E1, E2 and E4 of the Test Valley
Borough Revised Local Plan 2016 and the Residential Areas of
Special Character Supplementary Planning Document 2019
|
|
2.
|
Due
to the size, siting and form of the proposed dwelling, the proposal
would form a visually dominant, overbearing feature which would
unreasonably harm the outlook of neighbouring residents at Nos. 21,
23 and 25 The Avenue; Ambleside and those at Nos. 27 and 29
Croye Close. As such the proposal would fail to provide for the
amenity of neighbouring properties and would thereby conflict with
policy LHW4 of the Test Valley Borough Revised Borough Local Plan
2016
|
|
3.
|
The
application has failed to secure a satisfactory scheme of Nutrient
Neutrality mitigation through the prior completion of a S106
agreement. As such, it cannot be concluded that the proposal will
not result in a likely harmful significant effect on the
internationally designated nature conservation sites in the Solent,
contrary to the requirements of the Conservation of Habitats and
Species Regulations and as advised within guidance from Natural
England. As such, the proposal conflicts with policies E5 and
E8 of the Test Valley Borough Revised Local Plan 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
|