|
APPLICATION NO.
|
22/00625/FULLS
|
|
APPLICATION TYPE
|
FULL APPLICATION -
SOUTH
|
|
REGISTERED
|
04.03.2022
|
|
APPLICANT
|
Mr C Saunders
|
|
SITE
|
Durban House Nursing
Home, 33 Woodley Lane, Romsey, SO51 7JL, ROMSEY TOWN
|
|
PROPOSAL
|
Demolition of 'Mountbatten Wing' at
front of nursing home, demolition of No 35 Woodley Lane and
construction of extension accommodating 22 new nursing care
bedrooms and associated facilities
|
|
AMENDMENTS
|
Amended plans 05.05.22,
11.05.22 & 01.11.22
|
|
CASE
OFFICER
|
Paul Goodman
|
|
|
|
REFUSED for the reasons
|
|
1.
|
The proposed extension,
by reason of its scale, height and very close proximity to the
back-edge of the footway results in an uncharacteristic and
unacceptably prominent form of development in Woodley Lane. These
factors result in a visually intrusive form of development thereby
having a detrimental effect on the established character and
appearance of the street scene. The proposal is considered to
be contrary to policy E1 of the Test Valley Borough Revised Local
Plan (2016) and the paragraph 134 of the National Planning Policy
Framework 2021.
|
|
|
2.
|
The proposed
development by virtue of the height of the two storey extension and
close proximity to the common boundary with No.35A Woodley Lane
would result in an unacceptable feeling of enclosure that would
have an overbearing impact when experienced from the private rear
garden of that property. The proposal would therefore result in an
adverse effect on the living conditions of the occupiers of this
property contrary to policy LHW4 of the Test Valley Borough Revised
Local Plan 2016.
|
|
|
3.
|
The proposed
development by means of its nature, location and scale could have
likely significant effects upon the nearby Solent and Southampton
Water European Designated Site which is designated for its
conservation importance. In the absence of information relating to
the development achieving nutrient neutrality or onsite/off site
mitigation, the applicant has failed to satisfy the Council that
the proposal would not adversely affect the special interest of the
Solent and Southampton Water European Designated Site, therefore
the application is contrary to Policies COM2 and E5 of the adopted
Test Valley Borough Revised Local Plan (2016) and the Conservation
of Habitats and Species Regulations 2017 (as amended).
|
|
|
Note: In reaching the decision to refuse planning
permission for these reasons the Southern Area Planning Committee
acknowledged, via a planning balance exercise, the economic
benefits (comprising the provision of an additional 4no. jobs, and
employment during the construction phase) and social benefits
(comprising the provision of dementia and end of life care
accommodation to serve the needs of the community) that would
otherwise arise from the grant of permission but felt that the
effect of the proposal was such that these benefits did not weigh
sufficiently in favour to override the harm identified to the
street scene, character and appearance of the area, the amenity of
No.35A Woodley Lane, or the effect on the European
site.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|