Items
No. |
Item |
124. |
Apologies
|
125. |
Public Participation
Minutes:
In accordance with the
Council’s scheme of Public Participation, the following spoke
on the applications indicated.
Agenda Item No.
|
Page No.
|
Application
|
Speaker
|
7
|
10-43
|
21/03491/FULLS
|
Mr Sennitt (Applicant’s
Agent)
|
8
|
44-75
|
21/00662/FULLS
|
Ms Cutts
(Applicant’s Agent)
|
|
126. |
Declarations of Interest
Minutes:
Councillor Parker
declared a personal interest in application 21/03491/FULLS as he
was the Chairman of the Trustees of King John’s House which
is adjacent to the application. He made
a statement then left the room whilst the application was
considered.
|
127. |
Urgent Items
Minutes:
There were no urgent
items to consider.
|
128. |
Minutes
Minutes:
Resolved:
That
the minutes of the meeting held on 19 July 2022 be confirmed and
signed as a correct record.
|
129. |
Schedule of Development Applications
Minutes:
Resolved:
That
the applications for development, as set out below, be determined
as indicated.
|
130. |
21/03491/FULLS - 10.12.2021 PDF 343 KB
(OFFICER RECOMMENDATION: PERMISSION)
SITE: The Abbey Hotel, 11
Church Street, Romsey, SO51 8BT, ROMSEY TOWN
CASE OFFICER: Paul
Goodman
Additional documents:
Minutes:
|
APPLICATION NO.
|
21/03491/FULLS
|
|
APPLICATION TYPE
|
FULL
APPLICATION - SOUTH
|
|
REGISTERED
|
10.12.2021
|
|
APPLICANT
|
Mr Tim
Lincoln
|
|
SITE
|
The Abbey
Hotel , 11 Church Street, Romsey,
SO51 8BT,
ROMSEY TOWN
|
|
PROPOSAL
|
Erection of two detached
dwellings
|
|
AMENDMENTS
|
Amended Plans
received 31.03.22 (Plans & Elevations) and 11.07.22 (Plans
& Elevations).
|
|
CASE OFFICER
|
Mr Paul
Goodman
|
REFUSED for the following reason to:
|
1.
|
By virtue of the scale, bulk and design of the
proposal, in addition to the loss of the mature sycamore tree, the
development would be detrimental to the special architectural and
historic importance of the King Johns House heritage asset and its
setting. The development would result in less than substantial harm
to the significance of this designated heritage asset and the
conservation area in which it sits. The public benefits arising
from the development would not outweigh this harm. The loss of the
important sycamore tree would result in significant harm to the
public domain, particularly when viewed from public vantage points,
including public footpaths around the site, but in particular the
public right of way footpath behind the White Horse Hotel. As such,
the proposal is considered to be contrary to Policies E2(a), E9 and
COM2 of the Test Valley Borough Revised Local Plan (2016), in
addition to paragraph 202 & 131 of the National Planning Policy
Framework.
|
|
|
131. |
21/00662/FULLS - 08.04.2021 PDF 317 KB
(OFFICER RECOMMENDATION: PERMISSION)
SITE: Hillview, Romsey Road, King’s Somborne, SO20 6PR, KING’S
SOMBORNE
CASE OFFICER: Kate
Levey
Additional documents:
Minutes:
|
APPLICATION NO.
|
21/00662/FULLS
|
|
APPLICATION TYPE
|
FULL
APPLICATION - SOUTH
|
|
REGISTERED
|
08.04.2021
|
|
APPLICANT
|
Mr and Mrs M
Horscroft
|
|
SITE
|
Hillview,
Romsey Road, King’s Somborne,
SO20 6PR, KING’S
SOMBORNE
|
|
PROPOSAL
|
Erection of dwelling
with parking, access, garage, and terrace
|
|
AMENDMENTS
|
8th April
2021 - Heritage statement received
|
|
|
5th May
2021 – preliminary ecological appraisal received
|
|
|
10th May
2021 – nitrate neutrality calculations received
|
|
|
14th May
2021 – Highways visibility splays received
|
|
|
12th July
2021 – amended plans received
|
|
|
11th
August 2021 - Additional ecology information received
|
|
|
17th
November 2021 – amended ecology details received
|
|
|
27th May
2022 – amended plans received
|
|
|
1st July
2022 – amended landscape strategy and planting plan
received
|
|
CASE OFFICER
|
Kate Levey
|
Delegate to Head of Planning & Building for
completion of a legal agreement to secure;
- Removal
of nitrate mitigation land from agricultural
production;
- Future
management of the nitrate mitigation land;
- Monitoring fee.
Then PERMISSION subject to:
|
|
1.
|
The development hereby permitted shall be begun
within three years from the date of this permission.
Reason: To comply with the provision of Section 91 of
the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 as amended by Section 51 of
the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.
|
2.
|
The development hereby permitted shall not be carried
out except in complete accordance with the details shown on the
submitted plans, numbers
PL100B, PL 101B, PL 102B, PL 103B, PL 104B, PL 110B,
PL 120B, PL 121B, PL 122B, PL 123B,
L165/BC01 A, L165/BC02 B, PL200 A
Reason: For the avoidance of doubt and in the
interests of proper planning.
|
3.
|
No development shall take place above DPC level of
the development hereby permitted until samples and details of the
materials to be used in the construction of all external surfaces
hereby permitted have been submitted to and approved in writing by
the Local Planning Authority. Development shall be carried out in
accordance with the approved details.
Reason: To ensure the development has a satisfactory
external appearance in the interest of visual amenities in
accordance with Test Valley Borough Revised Local Plan (2016)
Policy E1.
|
4.
|
No development shall take place within the
application site until the applicant or their agent or successors
in title has secured the implementation of a programme of
archaeological work in accordance with a written scheme of
investigation and mitigation, which has been submitted by the
applicant and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority.
The submitted brief and specification shall include details of how
the park pale embankment will be protected for the duration of the
development period.
Reason: The site is of archaeological significance
and further investigation and mitigation works are required in
accordance with Test Valley Borough Revised Local Plan (2016)
Policy E9.
|
5.
|
No development shall take place within the
application site until the applicant or their agent or successors
in title has secured the implementation of a programme of
archaeological recording in accordance with a written scheme of
investigation, which has ...
view the full minutes text for item 131.
|
|