Items
No. |
Item |
244. |
Apologies
Minutes:
Apologies for absence
were received from Councillor K North.
|
245. |
Public Participation
Minutes:
In accordance with the
Council’s scheme of Public Participation, the following spoke
on the application indicated.
Agenda Item No.
|
Page No.
|
Application
|
Speaker
|
8
|
22 - 37
|
18/03203/FULLN
|
Mr Ewer (Chilbolton Parish
Council)
Ms Larcombe
(Objector on behalf of Chilbolton residents)
Mr Langridge (on behalf of
Applicant)
Cllr Drew (Ward Member)
|
9
|
38 - 81
|
21/02241/FULLN
|
Mr Ewer (Chilbolton Parish
Council)
Mrs Eaton
(Objector on behalf of Chilbolton residents)
Mr Rees (Applicant)
|
|
246. |
Declarations of Interest
Minutes:
There were no
declarations of interest.
|
247. |
Urgent Items
Minutes:
There were no urgent
items to consider.
|
248. |
Minutes
Minutes:
Resolved:
That
the minutes of the meeting held on 4 August 2022 be confirmed and
signed as a correct record.
|
249. |
Schedule of Development Applications
Minutes:
Resolved:
That
the applications for Development, as set out below, be determined
as indicated.
|
250. |
22/01012/FULLN PDF 260 KB
(OFFICER RECOMMENDATION: PERMISSION)
Site: Land at Bury Hill, Red
Rice Road, Red Rice,
UPPER
CLATFORD
CASE OFFICER: Samantha
Owen
Additional documents:
Minutes:
|
APPLICATION NO.
|
22/01012/FULLN
|
|
APPLICATION TYPE
|
FULL APPLICATION - NORTH
|
|
REGISTERED
|
12.04.2022
|
|
APPLICANT
|
Test Valley Borough Council - Mr Boyce Jeffery
|
|
SITE
|
Land at Bury Hill, Red
Rice Road, Red Rice,
UPPER
CLATFORD
|
|
PROPOSAL
|
Change of use to public open space and
construction of car park
|
|
AMENDMENTS
|
Additional Information received
25th May 2022 re:
Car park surface
Tree Survey
Visibility Splays
Heritage Statement
Additional Highway Plans received 21.06.2022,
28.07.2022.
Traffic Survey Submitted 27th July
2022
Additional Visibility Splay plans received
19.08.2022
|
|
CASE OFFICER
|
Samantha Owen
|
PERMISSION subject
to:
|
1.
|
The development
hereby permitted shall be begun within three years from the date of
this permission.
Reason: To comply with the provision of Section 91 of the
Town and Country Planning Act 1990 as amended by Section 51 of the
Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.
|
2.
|
The development
hereby permitted shall not be carried out except in complete
accordance with the details shown on the submitted plans, numbers
41010-0; GA_BH-1001 REV C; GA-BH1002 REVB, Proposed Path Layout;
Car Park Surface Section.
Reason: For the avoidance of doubt and in the interests of
proper planning.
|
3.
|
The development
shall not be brought into use until vehicular visibility splays as
indicated on drawing GA-BH1002 REVB, in which there should be no
obstruction to visibility exceeding 1 metre in height above the
adjacent carriageway channel line, have been completed. Such visibility splays shall thereafter be
maintained and retained for the lifetime of the development.
Reason: In the interests of highway safety and to accord
with Policy T1 of the Test valley Borough Revised Local Plan
2016.
|
4.
|
Prior to the
approved car park being brought into use, details
- of the proposed species and
density of planting to fill gaps in the hedgerows present on site
and;
- the proposed species and density
of planting of the approved bund that surrounds the car
park
shall be submitted
to and approved in writing by the Local Planning
Authority. Planting shall be carried
out in accordance with the approved details and thereafter retained
and maintained for the lifetime of the development.
Reason: To maintain the appearance of the site and enhance
the character of the development in the interest of visual amenity
and to contribute to the character of the local area in accordance
with Test Valley Borough Revised Local Plan (2016) Policy E2.
|
5.
|
No development
(including groundworks) shall commence on the car park until a plan
showing the proposed Tree Protection Fencing has been submitted to
and approved in writing by the Local Planning
Authority. This agreed Tree Protection
Fencing shall be maintained and retained for the duration of the
groundworks and construction of the car park.
Reason: To prevent the loss during development of trees
and natural features that are important to landscape features and
to ensure, so far as is practical, that development progresses in
accordance with current Arboriculture best practice, in accordance
with Policy E2 of the Test Valley Borough Revised Local Plan
2016.
|
6.
|
Prior to the
approved car park ...
view the full minutes text for item 250.
|
|
251. |
18/03203/FULLN PDF 360 KB
(OFFICER RECOMMENDATION: PERMISSION)
SITE: Land adjacent 12 Branksome Close,
Chilbolton, Stockbridge, SO20 6AQ, CHILBOLTON
CASE OFFICER: Samantha
Owen
Additional documents:
Minutes:
|
APPLICATION NO.
|
18/03203/FULLN
|
|
APPLICATION TYPE
|
FULL APPLICATION -
NORTH
|
|
REGISTERED
|
10.12.2018
|
|
APPLICANT
|
Aster Group
|
|
SITE
|
Land adjacent 12
Branksome Close, Chilbolton,
Stockbridge, SO20 6AQ, CHILBOLTON
|
|
PROPOSAL
|
Construction of detached chalet
bungalow and parking
|
|
AMENDMENTS
|
Amended plans received
25th January 2019, 8th April 2019, 13th
January 2020, 22 January 2021 and 24th May
2022
Amended plans received
16th December showing a reduction in bedroom space from
a 2 bedroom dwelling to a 1 bedroom dwelling.
Amended plans received
on the 24th May 2022 show the removal of the roof light
from the southern elevation and insertion of rooflights into the north-east and south-west
elevation.
|
|
CASE
OFFICER
|
Samantha Owen
|
|
|
|
|
DEFERRED to allow officers to present further information to the
Committee on the appeal decision relating to Martins Lodge which is
opposite the application site.
|
|
252. |
21/02241/FULLN PDF 397 KB
(OFFICER RECOMMENDATION: REFUSE)
SITE: Test Valley Farm, Little Drove Road, Chilbolton, SO20 6AN,
CHILBOLTON
CASE OFFICER: Emma
Jones
Additional documents:
Minutes:
|
APPLICATION NO.
|
21/02241/FULLN
|
|
|
APPLICATION TYPE
|
FULL APPLICATION -
NORTH
|
|
|
REGISTERED
|
28.07.2021
|
|
|
APPLICANT
|
Mr Chris Rees
|
|
|
SITE
|
Test Valley Farm,
Little Drove Road, Chilbolton, SO20 6AN, CHILBOLTON
|
|
|
PROPOSAL
|
Demolish building and erect seven
residential dwellings with associated access, landscape, and
parking
|
|
|
AMENDMENTS
|
Amended/additional plans and
information received:
•
10.03.2022
•
15.03.2022
|
|
|
CASE
OFFICER
|
Emma Jones
|
|
|
|
|
|
REFUSED for the reasons:
|
1.
|
The amount
of development proposed, together with its layout, appearance and
scale, would be cramped and intensive and would not integrate,
respect or complement the character of the area, and it would have
a detrimental impact on the appearance of the immediate area and
the landscape character of the area. In
addition, the proposed development has not been designed or located
to ensure that the health and future retention of important
landscape features including protected trees would not be
prejudiced, there is limited scope for the provision of new
landscape features to enable the proposed development to positively
integrate into the landscape character of the area, and
arrangements for the long term management and maintenance of the
existing and proposed landscaping have not been
secured. The proposed development would
be contrary to Policies E1 and E2 of the Test Valley Borough
Revised Local Plan 2016 and Policies EN2 and HD4 of the Chilbolton
Neighbourhood Development Plan.
|
2.
|
The
proposed development would result in the loss of habitats at the
site, with no satisfactory justification or suitable mitigation
measures being provided. Furthermore,
insufficient information has been submitted to demonstrate that the
proposals would not impact adversely on roosting or foraging bats
at the site, or on ecological linkages with the nearby West Down
Nature Reserve. The proposed development would not conserve,
restore, or enhance biodiversity, and would not satisfy the three
tests required to be considered in respect of protected species and
the requirements of the Conservation of Habitats and Species
Regulations (as amended). The proposed development would fail to
comply with Policy E5 of the Test Valley Borough Revised Local Plan
(2016) and Policy HD4 of the Chilbolton Neighbourhood Development
Plan.
|
3.
|
Insufficient information has been provided with the application
to demonstrate that the proposal can achieve nutrient
neutrality. As such, it cannot be
concluded that the proposal will not result in a likely harmful
significant effect on the internationally designated nature
conservation sites in the Solent, in accordance with the
requirements of the Conservation of Habitats and Species
Regulations 2017 (as amended) and as advised within guidance from
Natural England (updated March 2022).
As such, the proposal fails to comply with Policies E5 and E8 of
the Test Valley Borough Revised Local Plan (2016) and the
Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2017 (as
amended).
|
4.
|
It
has not been demonstrated that refuse vehicles would be able to
safely and efficiently manoeuvre within the site without conflicts
arising with the proposed buildings and/or landscaping. The proposed internal layout of the development
would therefore not be safe, functional or accessible for all
users, and the proposal would be contrary to Policy ...
view
the full minutes text for item 252.
|
|