Items
No. |
Item |
17. |
Apologies
Minutes:
Apologies were
received from Councillors A Dowden, C Dowden and
Jeffrey.
|
18. |
Public Participation
Minutes:
In accordance with the
Council’s scheme of Public Participation, the following spoke
on the applications indicated.
Agenda Item No.
|
Page No.
|
Application
|
Speaker
|
7
|
11-62
|
21/02715/FULLS
|
Mr Perress on behalf of Oxlease Meadows Residents Group (Objector)
Mr Clake (Objector)
Mr Goodenough (Applicant’s Agent)
|
9
|
79-98
|
21/03052/VARS
|
Ms Green (Applicant’s
Agent)
Councillor Daas (Ward Member) (5 minutes)
|
10
|
99-110
|
22/00360/FULLS
|
Mr Knowlson (Applicant)
|
|
19. |
Declarations of Interest
Minutes:
There were no
declarations of interest.
|
20. |
Urgent Items
Minutes:
There were no urgent
items to consider.
|
21. |
Minutes
Minutes:
Resolved:
That
the minutes of the meeting held on 16 May 2022 be confirmed and
signed as a correct record.
|
22. |
Schedule of Development Applications
Minutes:
Resolved:
That
the applications for development, as set out below, be determined
as indicated.
|
23. |
21/01542/VARS PDF 484 KB
(OFFICER RECOMMENDATION: PERMISSION)
SITE: Land North of Oxlease Meadows,
Oxlease Meadows, Romsey, ROMSEY
EXTRA
CASE OFFICER: Paul
Goodman
Additional documents:
Minutes:
|
APPLICATION NO.
|
21/02715/FULLS
|
|
APPLICATION TYPE
|
FULL APPLICATION -
SOUTH
|
|
REGISTERED
|
30.11.2021
|
|
APPLICANT
|
Mr Hanslip
|
|
SITE
|
Land North of
Oxlease Meadows, Oxlease Meadows, Romsey, ROMSEY EXTRA
|
|
PROPOSAL
|
Erection of 43 dwellings and
apartments, access, parking, landscaping and associated works
following demolition and site clearance
|
|
AMENDMENTS
|
Amended
Plans/Additional Information received 29.09.21, 17.01.22, 08.03.22,
09.03.22, 31.03.22, 08.04.22, 21.04.22 & 17.05.22.
|
|
CASE
OFFICER
|
Paul Goodman
|
REFUSED for the reasons:
|
1.
|
The
proposal represents unjustified development in the countryside
beyond the defined settlement boundaries and established building
lines within this part of the Borough, for which no overriding need
or justification has been provided. The proposed development would
result in the introduction of additional housing that would be
inappropriately located on a rural site away from existing
settlement boundaries and would breach established informal
building lines. The built development, so close to the nature
reserve and public vantage points, would be an obvious and harmful
intrusion into this countryside setting, adversely affecting the
character and appearance of the area when viewed from public
vantage points and would result in visual harm to the character and
appearance of this area. The proposal is therefore contrary to
Policies COM2 and E2(a) of the Test Valley Borough Revised Local
Plan 2016 and the National Planning Policy Framework (2021). The
Council can demonstrate a 5 year supply of housing land and the
local plan is also not absent or silent in respect of policies that
affect the development and against which it can adequately be
considered, there is therefore currently no need to release further
land for housing.
|
2.
|
The
benefits of the scheme advanced by the applicant are acknowledged.
However, the adverse impacts highlighted above would conflict with
the development plan as a whole; it would conflict with the general
spatial strategy including the settlement hierarchy and delivery
strategy (COM2). In doing so to grant permission would undermine
the development plan and the sustainable pattern of development
that it seeks to achieve across the Borough. This is of substantial
importance in the plan led system, given section 38(6) and the
advice in the NPPF. The benefits outlined by the applicant are not,
in the Council’s judgement, sufficient to outweigh the real
harm to both the character and appearance of the area and the
development plan as a whole, which is real, obvious and
significant. The proposal would thus result in conflict with local
and national planning policies. The public benefits identified are
limited and in most cases generic benefits which could be provided
by any site and a site that would not result in harm to such a
sensitive rural area. The proposal contravenes the key
development plan policies,
and
the limited benefits it brings about do not outweigh those
contraventions. Particularly because the Council has already
planned to deliver substantially the same benefits elsewhere around
the borough in a way that is more sustainable, through its adopted
local plan. Recent appeal decisions relating to other sites
are noted. However, those sites were considered on their own merits
and ... view
the full minutes text for item 23.
|
|
24. |
21/01542/VARS PDF 429 KB
(OFFICER RECOMMENDATION: PERMISSION)
SITE: 1
Upton Crescent, Nursling, SO16 8AA, NURSLING AND
ROWNHAMS
CASE OFFICER: Kate
Levey
Additional documents:
Minutes:
|
APPLICATION NO.
|
21/01542/VARS
|
|
APPLICATION TYPE
|
VARIATION OF CONDITIONS
- SOUTH
|
|
REGISTERED
|
20.05.2021
|
|
APPLICANT
|
Mr D Spiteri
|
|
SITE
|
1 Upton Crescent,
Nursling, SO16 8AA, NURSLING AND ROWNHAMS
|
|
PROPOSAL
|
Vary condition 9 of 19/02582/FULLS
(Demolition of existing detached double garage and erection of 2
bed dwelling) - substitute drawings to allow for changes to windows
and entryway
|
|
AMENDMENTS
|
31 July 2021 – amended
plans received
|
|
CASE
OFFICER
|
Kate Levey
|
WITHDRAWN at the request of the
interim Head of Planning and Building.
|
25. |
21/03052/VARS PDF 484 KB
(OFFICER RECOMMENDATION: PERMISSION)
SITE: Waitrose, 32 Alma Road, Romsey, SO51 8AS, ROMSEY TOWN
CASE OFFICER: Sarah
Barter
Additional documents:
Minutes:
|
APPLICATION NO.
|
21/03052/VARS
|
|
APPLICATION TYPE
|
VARIATION OF CONDITIONS
- SOUTH
|
|
REGISTERED
|
18.10.2021
|
|
APPLICANT
|
Waitrose Limited
|
|
SITE
|
Waitrose, 32 Alma Road,
Romsey, SO51 8AS, ROMSEY
TOWN
|
|
PROPOSAL
|
Variation of condition 18 of
approved application 08/00911/FULLS (Extension to food store and
associated works) to allow a wider delivery window for HGVs and
Ecomm deliveries (home delivery
service)
|
|
AMENDMENTS
|
Amended hours – January
2021
Delivery Noise Impact Statement
– Jan 2021
Ecomm impact statement – Jan
2021
Quiet Delivery Procedure
– March 2022
|
|
CASE
OFFICER
|
Sarah Barter
|
PERMISSION subject to:
|
1.
|
The
development hereby permitted shall be begun within three years from
the date of the original permission ref: 08/00911/FULLS dated
3rd April 2013.
Reason: To comply with the provision
of Section 91 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 as amended
by Section 51 of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act
2004
|
2.
|
The
materials to be used in the construction of all external surfaces
of the development hereby permitted shall match in type, colour and
texture those used in the existing building.
Reason: To ensure a satisfactory
visual relationship of the new development with the existing in
accordance with Test Valley Revised Borough Local Plan policy
E1.
|
3.
|
The
revisions to the landscaping of the public route to the south of
the building shall be carried out in accordance with the details
shown on the following drawings:
·
Drawing 16401.100 rev B “Removal
Plan”
·
Drawing 16401.001 rev E “Outline
Landscape Master Plan”
·
Drawing 16401.002 rev B “Landscape
Masterplan”
·
Drawing 16401.301 rev B “Proposed
Walkway Cross Section”
·
Drawing 16401.501 rev A “Detail
Planting Plan”.
Reason: To improve the appearance of
the site and enhance the character of the development in the
interest of visual amenity and contribute to the character of the
local area in accordance with Test Valley Revised Borough Local
Plan policy E1.
|
4.
|
The
management of the landscaped areas shall be carried out in
accordance with the details contained in the following drawings and
documents, as submitted and approved in relation to TVS.07802/14: -
Drawing 412/17 'Maintenance responsibility zones' received 1.7.02 -
'Landscape Maintenance & Management Plan - January 2002 -
revision A' received 25.2.02 Planting and works shall be carried
out in accordance with the approved schedule.
Reason: To ensure that the works
undertaken maintain the appearance of the site and enhance the
character of the development in the interest of visual amenity and
contribute to the character of the local area in accordance with
Test Valley Revised Borough Local Plan policy E1.
|
5.
|
The
development shall be carried out in accordance with Glanville's
"Flood Risk Assessment for Proposed Store Extension at Waitrose,
Romsey", Issue 2 - dated April 2008 and received on 15 April
2008.
Reason: To prevent the increased
risk of flooding in accordance with policy E7 of the Test Valley
Revised Borough Local Plan 2016.
|
6.
|
The
new entrance/exit lobby proposed in the south-west corner of the
building, as shown on drawing 0724-AG(P)-Z01 rev E, shall be made
available prior to the first use ... view
the full minutes text for item 25.
|
|
26. |
22/00360/FULLS PDF 248 KB
(OFFICER RECOMMENDATION: PERMISSION)
SITE: Cobra Lodge, Upton Lane, Nursling, SO16 0YB, NURSLING AND
ROWNHAMS
CASE OFFICER: Sarah
Barter
Additional documents:
Minutes:
|
APPLICATION NO.
|
22/00360/FULLS
|
|
APPLICATION TYPE
|
FULL APPLICATION -
SOUTH
|
|
REGISTERED
|
14.02.2022
|
|
APPLICANT
|
Mr Sean Knowlson
|
|
SITE
|
Cobra Lodge, Upton
Lane, Nursling, SO16 0YB, NURSLING
AND ROWNHAMS
|
|
PROPOSAL
|
Erection of kennels / runs and
consulting room
|
|
AMENDMENTS
|
Landscape information received
15th April 2022
|
|
CASE
OFFICER
|
Sarah Barter
|
PERMISSION subject to:
|
1.
|
The
development hereby permitted shall be begun within three years from
the date of this permission.
Reason: To comply with the provision
of Section 91 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 as amended
by Section 51 of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act
2004.
|
2.
|
The
development hereby permitted shall not be carried out except in
complete accordance with the details shown on the submitted plans,
numbers
Proposed block plan
Elevations and floor plans
Elevations and floor plans
Site
location plan
Reason: For the avoidance of doubt
and in the interests of proper planning.
|
3.
|
The
external materials to be used in the construction of all external
surfaces of the development hereby permitted shall match in type,
colour and texture those used in the existing building.
Reason: To ensure a satisfactory
visual relationship of the new development with the existing in
accordance with Test Valley Borough Revised Local Plan (2016)
Policy E1
|
4.
|
The
activities hereby approved shall only take place between the hours
of: - 08:00 hours and 18:00 hours Monday to Friday; 08:00 hours and 17:00 hours on Saturday; 08:00
hours and 14:00 on Sundays.
Reason: In order that the Local
Planning Authority can exercise control in the locality In the
interest of the amenities in the local area in accordance with Test
Valley Borough Revised Local Plan (2016) Policies E8 and
LHW4.
|
5.
|
The
kennels in the building, the subject of this planning permission,
shall be used for the care of staff owned dogs only. All dogs using
the kennels in this building shall be removed off-site outside of
the hours set out in condition 4, and the building shall not be
used for overnight boarding kennels.
Reason: In order that the Local
Planning Authority can exercise control in the locality in the
interest of local amenity and to protect the character of the local
area in accordance with Test Valley Borough Revised Local Plan
(2016) policies E2 and LHW4.
|
6.
|
Landscape works shall be carried out before the end of the first
available planting season following the first use of the building
hereby approved in accordance with the approved information titled
landscape plan and dated 15th April 2022. Any trees
or planting that are removed, die or
become, in the opinion of the Local Planning Authority, seriously
damaged or defective within 5 years of planting, shall be replaced
before the end of the current or first available planting season
following the failure, removal or damage of the
planting.
Reason: To ensure the provision of
amenity afforded by proper maintenance of existing and new
landscape features as an improvement of the appearance of the site
and to enhance the character of the development ...
view
the full minutes text for item 26.
|
|
27. |
Scheme of Delegations to Officers PDF 121 KB
To approve the Council’s
Scheme of Delegations to Officers
Minutes:
Resolved:
That
the Scheme of Delegations to Officers annexed to the report to
Annual Council, in so far as it applies to the powers and duties of
the Southern Area Planning Committee, be approved.
|